Industries
Intake calls and first drafts, off your associates' desks.
Unqualified enquiries, conflict checks, and drafting from precedent eat billable hours that should go to the matters clients are paying for.
Book a discovery callWhat this costs you today
What intake and first-draft work costs your firm in non-billable time.
ROI calculator
Law firm
e.g. intake qualification and first-draft documents from precedent
Current monthly cost
$7,794
~50% automatable = $3,897/mo saved
At that rate, a $3,000 sprint pays back in ~3.3 weeks.
Objections, answered
Client confidentiality is non-negotiable — where does our matter data go?
Into an isolated workspace for your firm only: separate credentials, separate storage, no pooling with other clients' data, and no use of your documents to train any model. Where a model provider is involved, we use API terms that exclude training on your inputs, and the data-handling terms are written into the engagement before anything is connected.
Won't AI drafting create malpractice risk?
Only if it skips review, which ours never does. The system drafts from your own precedent bank and flags what it couldn't match; a lawyer approves every document before it leaves the firm. It removes the blank-page hours, not the professional judgement.
Why not just let associates use ChatGPT?
A chat window doesn't know your precedents, your intake criteria, or your conflict-check process, and it leaves no audit trail. A deployed system works from the firm's own documents, logs what it produced, and fits the steps your matters already go through.
Other industries
Ready to see what this would look like for legal?
Book a discovery call